Inspiration: Examples of using Condatis to plan restoration

In keeping with the ambitious national and international goals for biodiversity recovery, the Condatis software was developed to support the planning of restoration – specifically, restoration that could yield the greatest benefit to connectivity. 

Two types of Condatis analysis -bottlenecks and prioritisation –  can be used to support decisions about landscape restoration. Prioritisation can be used when there is a mapped ‘shortlist’ of areas that could be restored. By contrast, bottlenecks indicate places where flow is restricted in the network, irrespective of whether restoration is possible in these areas. 

Bottlenecks mapping to support nature recovery in England 

Condatis was used in a collaborative project with Natural England to identify connectivity bottlenecks across England.

The aim was to help with various initiatives that are able to steer funding and effort on habitat rehabilitation and restoration. Notably, these include Local Nature Recovery Strategies that cover the whole country, and Nature Recovery Projects at the landscape scale. For full details of the project see our Natural England Commissioned report and the bottlenecks data published in 2024.

Close-up of a national bottlenecks map, showing grey search zones around the major and severe bottleneck lines

To produce bottleneck maps, the movement of generic species with dispersal distances of 1 km and 3.4 km was modelled in four different directions across the landscape, focusing initially on three broad seminatural habitats: grassland, heathland, and wetlands. The national maps produced show the most severe bottlenecks in the three habitats, which occurred especially towards the middle of England. Recommended ‘search areas’ were drawn around the bottlenecks to guide practitioners as to where restoration could be most impactful, if it were feasible. It is recommended that these maps are used in conjunction with other available information (e.g. land use maps or infrastructure), because, as mentioned above, a ‘bottleneck’ only indicates that there is a problematic gap in habitat, irrespective of the reason for the gap. 

The project identified advantages and disadvantages to running Condatis analyses at the national and local scales. The national scale analyses provide context which can be used to inform every local area as well as showing the alternative routes through the habitat network that species can use. However, the national scale analysis is restricted to modelling the movement of medium- or long-distance dispersers. Example analyses at a finer spatial resolution – at Nature Recovery Project scale – considered species with shorter dispersal distances. 

Multi-criteria planning for the Northern Forest  

Image of the The Northern Forest Area showing existing community forests, major cities and motorways

The Northern Forest project is a major environmental initiative in the UK, aiming to create much better connected woodland stretching from Liverpool to Hull across northern England. Spanning urban areas, farmland, and existing woodlands, the project plans to plant 50 million trees over 25 years to boost biodiversity, improve air quality, and provide recreational spaces. Using Condatis, the project has identified critical bottlenecks in woodland habitat connectivity, particularly in areas where species movement is restricted by urban development or fragmented landscapes.

The bottleneck map was used to produce a tree-planting scenario map for the Northern Forest, which incorporated additional factors such as flooding risk and mental health benefits. 

Prioritising restoration within feasible areas: The B-Lines programme

Condatis has helped to shape the B-Lines programme, Buglife’s landscape-scale solution to reversing pollinator declines across the UK. B-Lines are 3km corridors connecting our best remaining wildflower-rich habitats- a prioritised national network for habitat creation and restoration to restore connectivity. B-Lines is a shared endeavour where all landowners and managers can prioritise their wildflower creation and restoration work to contribute to a nature network to reverse pollinator declines. 

Cells within B-lines in Northumberland prioritised with Condatis. Darker brown means higher priority.

Condatis helped to define the B-Lines concept by providing the evidence base that corridors of habitat stepping stones are the most effective approach to restoring connectivity to help pollinators move across the changing landscape. It can also play an important role in identifying the parts of the B-Lines network where connectivity is currently at its lowest. In response, it can help to identify where new habitats within the B-Lines network can deliver the greatest level of connectivity by assessing how individual cells contribute to the overall connectivity of the network. This type of analysis – called prioritisation by dropping – was performed in 2014-15, near the outset of the B-lines programme, in three English regions. You can access the regional reports here and here.

B-Lines have been adopted and delivered by local authorities, infrastructure companies, nature conservation charities and businesses to help them prioritise their delivery and maximise the delivery for pollinators. From 2014 to 2024, there have been over 1000 individual B-lines actions in England alone, and they have affected approximately 3,700 ha of land.